UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L
UBTL.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and TI5G.L (iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - UBTL.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD while TI5G.L tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UBTL.L returned -4.40%/yr vs 2.89%/yr for TI5G.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBTL.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for TI5G.L.
Performance
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UBTL.L is traded in GBp, while TI5G.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TI5G.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBTL.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than TI5G.L's 2.07% return.
UBTL.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- -0.05%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- -3.66%
- 5Y*
- -4.40%
- 10Y*
- —
TI5G.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBTL.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | -0.05% | -2.86% | -3.20% | -5.34% | -24.00% | 9.31% | 19.40% | 13.92% | 6.86% |
TI5G.L iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.07% | 5.70% | 4.60% | 3.62% | -3.69% | 5.28% | 4.05% | 3.05% | -0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBTL.L and TI5G.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018 | 0.32 |
The correlation between UBTL.L and TI5G.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L — Risk / Return Rank
UBTL.L
TI5G.L
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) and iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBTL.L | TI5G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.31 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 5.26 | -4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 17.49 | -16.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBTL.L | TI5G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 1.68 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | 0.94 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.89 | -0.89 |
Drawdowns
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, which is greater than TI5G.L's maximum drawdown of -5.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTL.L and TI5G.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBTL.L | TI5G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.66% | -5.63% | -33.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -0.83% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -1.55% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.66% | -5.63% | -33.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.41% | -0.08% | -34.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -1.02% | -15.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.09% | 0.25% | +3.84% |
Volatility
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.36% compared to iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) at 0.58%. This indicates that UBTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TI5G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBTL.L | TI5G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 0.58% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 1.69% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.40% | 2.60% | +6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 3.08% | +12.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 3.23% | +12.11% |
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBTL.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TI5G.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UBTL.L vs. TI5G.L - Dividend Comparison
UBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than TI5G.L's 5.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TI5G.L iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 5.85% | 5.98% | 6.83% | 5.19% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 3.06% | 3.28% | 2.36% | 0.00% |
UBTL.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.15% | 5.34% | 5.57% | 6.49% | 8.27% | 2.56% | 0.73% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBTL.L and TI5G.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TI5G.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TI5G.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for UBTL.L.
UBTL.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while TI5G.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UBTL.L and 0.12% for TI5G.L.
Find the right allocation for UBTL.L and TI5G.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer