PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBTL.L vs. GILE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBTL.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.21%-2.86%-3.20%-5.34%-24.00%9.31%19.40%13.92%0.17%1.93%
GILE.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.68%7.76%-6.57%-0.11%-14.94%-1.55%13.63%-0.20%-1.86%2.12%
Different Trading Currencies

UBTL.L is traded in GBp, while GILE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the GILE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBTL.L achieves a -0.21% return, which is significantly lower than GILE.L's 0.68% return.


UBTL.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.93%
1Y
-4.73%
3Y*
-4.62%
5Y*
-4.01%
10Y*

GILE.L

1D
0.63%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.90%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
-0.33%
5Y*
-1.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UBTL.L and GILE.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBTL.L
UBTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
UBTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GILE.L
GILE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GILE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
GILE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBTL.LGILE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.35

0.80

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.38

1.23

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.15

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

1.58

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.75

3.82

-4.57

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBTL.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the GILE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBTL.L and GILE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBTL.LGILE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

0.80

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

-0.20

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

-0.05

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between UBTL.L and GILE.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Dividend Comparison

UBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than GILE.L's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBTL.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
6.16%5.34%5.57%6.49%8.27%2.56%0.73%2.60%2.29%1.99%
GILE.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.07%1.11%1.05%0.91%0.86%0.69%1.12%2.13%0.41%0.00%

Drawdowns

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -38.66%, which is greater than GILE.L's maximum drawdown of -24.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBTL.L and GILE.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UBTL.LGILE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.66%

-24.70%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-3.30%

-8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.66%

-24.70%

-13.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.51%

-18.80%

-15.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.46%

-9.96%

-6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.29%

1.08%

+6.21%

Volatility

UBTL.L vs. GILE.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg TIPS 10+ UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBTL.L) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (GILE.L) at 2.39%. This indicates that UBTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UBTL.LGILE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.39%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

4.15%

+2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.40%

7.11%

+6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.30%

9.02%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

9.36%

+6.09%