UBOT vs. PBOT
UBOT (Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares) and PBOT (Pictet AI & Automation ETF) are both Robotics funds. UBOT is passively managed, while PBOT is actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UBOT charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for PBOT.
Performance
UBOT vs. PBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a -8.40% return, which is significantly lower than PBOT's 30.11% return.
UBOT
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- 6M
- -16.43%
- YTD
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- -9.18%
- 10Y*
- —
PBOT
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 26.87%
- YTD
- 30.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBOT vs. PBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares | -8.40% | -4.87% |
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 30.11% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBOT and PBOT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBOT vs. PBOT — Risk / Return Rank
UBOT
PBOT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UBOT vs. PBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Pictet AI & Automation ETF (PBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBOT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBOT vs. PBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, which is greater than PBOT's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and PBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBOT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.24% | -15.78% | -70.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.65% | -3.36% | -52.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.84% | -4.27% | -45.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.34% | — | — |
Volatility
UBOT vs. PBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBOT | PBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.10% | 26.94% | +25.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.86% | 26.94% | +26.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.57% | 26.94% | +36.63% |
UBOT vs. PBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBOT vs. PBOT - Dividend Comparison
UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than PBOT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBOT Pictet AI & Automation ETF | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBOT Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares | 1.08% | 0.78% | 1.45% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 2.25% | 15.83% | 0.55% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBOT and PBOT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.
UBOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.07% for PBOT.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Pictet. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 0.70% for PBOT.
Find the right allocation for UBOT and PBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer