UBEW vs. FTXN
UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and FTXN (First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FTXN is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Oil & Gas Index. UBEW is actively managed, while FTXN is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXN.
Performance
UBEW vs. FTXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -17.10% return, which is significantly lower than FTXN's 29.57% return.
UBEW
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -12.95%
- YTD
- -17.10%
- 6M
- -27.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXN
- 1D
- -2.45%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 29.57%
- 6M
- 24.63%
- 1Y
- 39.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.80%
- 5Y*
- 17.19%
- 10Y*
- —
UBEW vs. FTXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | -17.10% | -17.23% |
FTXN First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 29.57% | 0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBEW and FTXN is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBEW vs. FTXN — Risk / Return Rank
UBEW
FTXN
UBEW vs. FTXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF (FTXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBEW | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.09 | 0.27 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
UBEW vs. FTXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum FTXN drawdown of -73.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and FTXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBEW | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -73.49% | +36.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.86% | -9.56% | -26.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -19.23% | -5.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.90% | — |
Volatility
UBEW vs. FTXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBEW | FTXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.16% | 22.98% | +19.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 29.68% | +12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 31.80% | +10.36% |
UBEW vs. FTXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBEW vs. FTXN - Dividend Comparison
UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.36%, more than FTXN's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXN First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF | 2.09% | 2.83% | 2.51% | 3.41% | 2.26% | 1.04% | 1.76% | 2.72% | 2.16% | 1.78% | 0.20% |
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | 32.36% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBEW and FTXN have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.
UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 32.36%, compared with 2.09% for FTXN.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.60% for FTXN.
Find the right allocation for UBEW and FTXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer