UBER vs. PPFB.DE
UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold. Over the past 3 years, UBER returned 18.47%/yr vs 31.53%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UBER vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UBER is traded in USD, while PPFB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PPFB.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 1.54% return.
UBER
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -7.82%
- YTD
- -15.74%
- 6M
- -19.10%
- 1Y
- -17.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- —
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 30.61%
- 3Y*
- 31.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBER vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -15.74% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -9.67% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 1.54% | 68.33% | 26.50% | 12.88% | 1.14% | -1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBER and PPFB.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBER vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
UBER
PPFB.DE
UBER vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBER | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.25 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 1.87 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 4.78 | -5.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBER vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBER | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -21.42% | -46.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.46% | -17.21% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.46% | -17.21% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.22% | -15.63% | -15.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.67% | -5.42% | -20.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.93% | 6.76% | +11.17% |
Volatility
UBER vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.67%. This indicates that UBER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBER | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.96% | 5.67% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.21% | 21.08% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.66% | 24.30% | +8.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.82% | 17.39% | +27.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.61% | 17.39% | +33.22% |
Dividends
UBER vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither UBER nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UBER and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for UBER and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer