PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBER vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UBER vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -10.84% return, which is significantly lower than IBKR's 44.54% return.


UBER

1D
5.81%
1M
-2.98%
YTD
-10.84%
6M
-11.01%
1Y
-13.20%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*

IBKR

1D
2.15%
1M
6.73%
YTD
44.54%
6M
47.85%
1Y
84.38%
3Y*
67.46%
5Y*
42.22%
10Y*
26.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBER vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-10.84%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
44.54%46.37%114.43%15.14%-8.35%31.12%31.71%-16.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UBER and IBKR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.33

The correlation between UBER and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBER:

$150.90B

IBKR:

$41.59B

EPS

UBER:

$4.05

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

UBER:

17.97

IBKR:

24.70

PEG Ratio

UBER:

0.11

IBKR:

0.85

PS Ratio

UBER:

2.86

IBKR:

4.76

PB Ratio

UBER:

6.10

IBKR:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBER:

$53.69B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBER:

$22.03B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBER:

$5.85B

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBER vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBER vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBERIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.35

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

4.54

-4.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

11.52

-12.26

UBER vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBER and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBER vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -63.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBERIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-63.66%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.46%

-18.70%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-38.66%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.45%

-38.66%

-21.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.22%

0.00%

-27.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-24.84%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.01%

7.35%

+10.66%

Volatility

UBER vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 9.99%, while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBERIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

10.93%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.87%

27.86%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.17%

37.75%

-4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.88%

34.51%

+10.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.64%

33.37%

+17.27%

Dividends

UBER vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.35%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UBER vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uber Technologies, Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
13.20B
765.00M
(UBER) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UBER and IBKR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBKR has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to UBER (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs IBKR's -63.66%.

IBKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBER and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer