PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB74.L vs. VUTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UB74.L is traded in GBp, while VUTA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUTA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB74.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than VUTA.L's 0.03% return.


UB74.L

1D
0.12%
1M
1.13%
YTD
0.66%
6M
0.25%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
2.42%

VUTA.L

1D
0.21%
1M
1.16%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
0.21%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UB74.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.66%-2.06%5.76%-1.65%7.62%0.57%-0.46%2.06%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.03%-1.12%2.50%-1.89%-1.88%-1.09%3.97%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between UB74.L and VUTA.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.88

The correlation between UB74.L and VUTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB74.L
UB74.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UB74.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB74.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB74.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UB74.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB74.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VUTA.L
VUTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UB74.LVUTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

0.86

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

2.08

+0.32

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB74.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB74.L and VUTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UB74.LVUTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.08

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.08

+0.19

Drawdowns

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB74.L drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum VUTA.L drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB74.L and VUTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB74.LVUTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-23.40%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-5.21%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.93%

-8.20%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-16.17%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.81%

-18.49%

+10.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-15.38%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.16%

-0.34%

Volatility

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) at 1.39%. This indicates that UB74.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB74.LVUTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.39%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.40%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

5.98%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.08%

8.70%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.27%

9.39%

-0.12%

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UB74.L and VUTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UB74.L vs. VUTA.L - Dividend Comparison

UB74.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, while VUTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UB74.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.69%4.94%3.67%2.23%0.41%0.36%1.68%2.28%1.10%0.65%0.62%0.41%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UB74.L and VUTA.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB74.L and VUTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

UB74.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB74.L and VUTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer