UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L
UB20.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and 3KOR.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - UB20.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while 3KOR.L is a South Korea Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. UB20.L is passively managed, while 3KOR.L is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UB20.L returned 11.71%/yr vs 49.40%/yr for 3KOR.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UB20.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3KOR.L.
Performance
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UB20.L is traded in GBp, while 3KOR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3KOR.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UB20.L achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than 3KOR.L's 124.48% return.
UB20.L
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.32%
3KOR.L
- 1D
- -11.21%
- 1M
- -56.43%
- 6M
- 66.70%
- YTD
- 124.48%
- 1Y
- 375.45%
- 3Y*
- 49.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.97% | 12.00% | 6.98% | -0.10% | 0.62% |
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities | 124.48% | 324.15% | -61.68% | 9.27% | -54.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between UB20.L and 3KOR.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2022 | 0.53 |
The correlation between UB20.L and 3KOR.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Basic Materials
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Industrials
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Real Estate
UB20.L
3KOR.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Utilities
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Healthcare
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Consumer Defensive
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Energy
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Communication Services
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Technology
UB20.L
3KOR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L — Risk / Return Rank
UB20.L
3KOR.L
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UB20.L | 3KOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 5.76 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 15.71 | -9.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UB20.L drawdown since its inception was -32.34%, smaller than the maximum 3KOR.L drawdown of -85.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB20.L and 3KOR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UB20.L | 3KOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.34% | -85.83% | +53.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -64.70% | +57.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.80% | -74.96% | +57.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -64.70% | +63.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -52.67% | +46.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 23.77% | -21.12% |
Volatility
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) is 2.64%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities (3KOR.L) has a volatility of 61.37%. This indicates that UB20.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3KOR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UB20.L | 3KOR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 61.37% | -58.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 119.63% | -110.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 128.33% | -117.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 86.79% | -72.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 86.79% | -71.06% |
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UB20.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than 3KOR.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UB20.L vs. 3KOR.L - Dividend Comparison
UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while 3KOR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3KOR.L Leverage Shares 3x Long South Korea ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.87% | 3.86% | 3.26% | 3.96% | 3.66% | 2.60% | 3.05% | 4.08% | 4.33% | 3.43% | 4.00% | 5.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UB20.L and 3KOR.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB20.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB20.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3KOR.L.
UB20.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while 3KOR.L is South Korea Equities. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UB20.L and 0.75% for 3KOR.L.
Find the right allocation for UB20.L and 3KOR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer