PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UB17.L vs. UC04.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UB17.L vs. UC04.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB17.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and UC04.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UB17.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC04.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB17.L returned 10.97%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for UC04.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB17.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for UC04.L.

Performance

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB17.L achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than UC04.L's 10.50% return. Over the past 10 years, UB17.L has underperformed UC04.L with an annualized return of 10.97%, while UC04.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.

UB17.L

1D
0.30%
1M
2.62%
YTD
5.70%
6M
10.09%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.97%

UC04.L

1D
0.01%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.32%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
16.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UB17.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		5.70%45.25%4.09%19.69%-2.09%12.46%-2.84%12.93%-14.42%17.41%
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		10.50%9.28%27.38%20.52%-10.51%28.96%16.61%26.56%-0.32%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between UB17.L and UC04.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013

0.23

The correlation between UB17.L and UC04.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (10 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UB17.L
UC04.L

Financial Services

42.2%
11.2%

Utilities

11.8%
2.1%

Industrials

10.2%
8.1%

Energy

7.7%
3.4%

Healthcare

6.0%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
4.7%

Communication Services

5.1%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
9.9%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.7%

Technology

2.4%
37.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.9%

Financial Services

UB17.L
42.2%
UC04.L
11.2%

Utilities

UB17.L
11.8%
UC04.L
2.1%

Industrials

UB17.L
10.2%
UC04.L
8.1%

Energy

UB17.L
7.7%
UC04.L
3.4%

Healthcare

UB17.L
6.0%
UC04.L
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

UB17.L
5.2%
UC04.L
4.7%

Communication Services

UB17.L
5.1%
UC04.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

UB17.L
4.5%
UC04.L
9.9%

Basic Materials

UB17.L
3.5%
UC04.L
1.7%

Technology

UB17.L
2.4%
UC04.L
37.7%

Real Estate

UB17.L
1.5%
UC04.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with UB17.L:
UB17.L vs. S7XP.LUB17.L vs. UC63.LUB17.L vs. LCPE.LUB17.L vs. IMV.LUB17.L vs. EEIP.LUB17.L vs. MMS.LUB17.L vs. EUFM.L
Often compared with UC04.L:
UC04.L vs. SMHUC04.L vs. HMCA.LUC04.L vs. QQQUC04.L vs. ^GSPCUC04.L vs. SPX5.LUC04.L vs. SPYUC04.L vs. SEMC.L

Return for Risk

UB17.L vs. UC04.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UB17.L
UB17.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UB17.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB17.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB17.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UB17.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB17.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
UC04.L
UC04.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UC04.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC04.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC04.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UC04.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC04.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UB17.LUC04.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.13
2.70

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.87
3.61

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.74

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

13.07

-2.88

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB17.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the UC04.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB17.L and UC04.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UB17.LUC04.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.70

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

1.01

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.02

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.98

+0.03

Drawdowns

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB17.L drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, which is greater than UC04.L's maximum drawdown of -25.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB17.L and UC04.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UB17.LUC04.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.67%

-25.93%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-7.67%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-21.14%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.05%

-21.14%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.67%

-25.93%

-12.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-0.17%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-3.46%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.20%

+0.88%

Volatility

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC04.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that UB17.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC04.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UB17.LUC04.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

2.72%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

7.24%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

10.63%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

14.66%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.37%

15.86%

+10.51%

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB17.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than UC04.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UB17.L vs. UC04.L - Dividend Comparison

UB17.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than UC04.L's 0.84% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UB17.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		3.77%3.37%3.64%3.87%4.01%2.74%2.39%4.11%4.02%3.42%5.21%4.14%
UC04.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		0.84%0.96%0.95%1.12%1.19%0.89%1.28%1.40%1.50%1.32%1.52%1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

UB17.L and UC04.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC04.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC04.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UB17.L.

UB17.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC04.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. UB17.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC04.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UB17.L and 0.14% for UC04.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB17.L and UC04.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer