UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB17.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and JRDZ.L (JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from UBS and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UB17.L returned 24.74% vs 22.17% for JRDZ.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB17.L achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than JRDZ.L's 8.20% return.

UB17.L

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 2.62%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 24.74%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

JRDZ.L

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 8.20%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 22.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UB17.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	5.70%	45.25%	-2.77%
JRDZ.L JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)	8.20%	31.47%	-1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between UB17.L and JRDZ.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024	0.27

Return for Risk

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB17.L

UB17.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
UB17.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UB17.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
UB17.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
UB17.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UB17.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

JRDZ.L

JRDZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 98
JRDZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
JRDZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) and JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UB17.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	6.59	-4.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	9.28	-6.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.16	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	32.94	-29.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.19	83.74	-73.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB17.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the JRDZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB17.L and JRDZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UB17.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	6.59	-4.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	7.14	-6.14

Drawdowns

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB17.L drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, which is greater than JRDZ.L's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB17.L and JRDZ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UB17.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.67%	-4.00%	-34.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-4.00%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-0.05%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.25%	-1.05%	-4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	—	—

Volatility

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) is 3.60%, while JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist) (JRDZ.L) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that UB17.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UB17.L	JRDZ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	4.56%	-0.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.13%	20.18%	-6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.03%	23.37%	-3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.37%	23.37%	+3.00%

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UB17.L and JRDZ.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UB17.L vs. JRDZ.L - Dividend Comparison

UB17.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than JRDZ.L's 2.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JRDZ.L JPMorgan Eurozone Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF EUR (dist)	2.29%	2.55%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UB17.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	3.77%	3.37%	3.64%	3.87%	4.01%	2.74%	2.39%	4.11%	4.02%	3.42%	5.21%	4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UB17.L and JRDZ.L in my portfolio?

UB17.L and JRDZ.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UB17.L or JRDZ.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UB17.L or JRDZ.L?

UB17.L and JRDZ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between UB17.L and JRDZ.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan.