UB06.L vs. MMS.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L).

UB06.L and MMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UB06.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 19, 2002. MMS.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. It was launched on Sep 7, 2017. Both UB06.L and MMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UB06.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	-0.09%	30.63%	1.07%
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Different Trading Currencies

UB06.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

UB06.L

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -0.09%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

MMS.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB06.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

MMS.L

Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist

UB06.L

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

Return for Risk

UB06.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB06.L

UB06.L Risk / Return Rank: 64
UB06.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UB06.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
UB06.L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
UB06.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UB06.L Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UB06.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UB06.L	MMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	—	—

Dividends

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

UB06.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while MMS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UB06.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis	2.67%	2.49%	2.80%	2.68%	2.68%	1.88%	1.57%	2.84%	3.20%	2.52%	2.50%	2.92%
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB06.L drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than MMS.L's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB06.L and MMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	UB06.L	MMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	0.00%	-31.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	0.00%	-10.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.93%	0.00%	-6.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.04%	0.00%	-5.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	0.00%	+2.88%

Volatility

UB06.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L) at 0.00%. This indicates that UB06.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UB06.L	MMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.14%	0.00%	+6.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	0.00%	+10.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	0.00%	+15.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	0.00%	+16.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.76%	0.00%	+16.76%