UB03.L vs. IMV.L
UB03.L (UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis) and IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - UB03.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while IMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB03.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 7.68%/yr for IMV.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB03.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IMV.L.
Performance
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UB03.L achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than IMV.L's 4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UB03.L has outperformed IMV.L with an annualized return of 8.91%, while IMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.
UB03.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
IMV.L
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 8.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB03.L UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 5.64% | 26.20% | 9.58% | 8.35% | 3.14% | 16.12% | -10.39% | 17.37% | -7.12% | 9.91% |
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 4.72% | 17.66% | 6.63% | 8.56% | -7.83% | 13.68% | 1.50% | 16.37% | -2.91% | 13.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between UB03.L and IMV.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, UB03.L and IMV.L have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UB03.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
UB03.L
IMV.L
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UB03.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UB03.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.17 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.97 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 2.92 | +5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UB03.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.91 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.69 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.62 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.71 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UB03.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, which is greater than IMV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB03.L and IMV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UB03.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.84% | -24.48% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -8.50% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.11% | -8.50% | -3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.11% | -17.42% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -24.48% | -9.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -4.62% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -3.57% | -1.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.83% | +0.28% |
Volatility
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UB03.L) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) at 2.89%. This indicates that UB03.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UB03.L | IMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 2.89% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 7.71% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 9.13% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 10.97% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 12.31% | +8.66% |
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UB03.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IMV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UB03.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison
UB03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while IMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UB03.L UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 2.71% | 2.92% | 3.75% | 3.63% | 3.69% | 3.10% | 3.72% | 4.13% | 4.21% | 3.30% | 3.61% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UB03.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB03.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB03.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IMV.L.
UB03.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UB03.L and 0.25% for IMV.L.
Find the right allocation for UB03.L and IMV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer