UB02.L vs. TPXG.L
UB02.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) and TPXG.L (Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from UBS and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB02.L returned 8.76%/yr vs 8.57%/yr for TPXG.L. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UB02.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TPXG.L.
Performance
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with UB02.L having a 12.50% return and TPXG.L slightly lower at 12.34%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UB02.L having a 8.76% annualized return and TPXG.L not far behind at 8.57%.
UB02.L
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
TPXG.L
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 12.34%
- 1Y
- 28.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB02.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 12.50% | 17.42% | 9.12% | 13.98% | -7.14% | 2.16% | 12.42% | 14.28% | -8.60% | 13.20% |
TPXG.L Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY | 12.34% | 18.25% | 8.19% | 13.45% | -5.57% | 1.08% | 10.62% | 15.26% | -11.01% | 15.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UB02.L and TPXG.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2015 | 0.96 |
The correlation between UB02.L and TPXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Industrials
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Financial Services
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Consumer Cyclical
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Communication Services
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Healthcare
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Consumer Defensive
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Basic Materials
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Real Estate
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Utilities
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Energy
UB02.L
TPXG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UB02.L
TPXG.L
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UB02.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UB02.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.71 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 8.39 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UB02.L drawdown since its inception was -23.08%, smaller than the maximum TPXG.L drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB02.L and TPXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UB02.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.08% | -59.09% | +36.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -10.57% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.15% | -13.59% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.58% | -18.63% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.08% | -49.79% | +26.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.47% | -6.31% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -17.26% | +11.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.42% | +0.14% |
Volatility
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (UB02.L) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) at 5.84%. This indicates that UB02.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UB02.L | TPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 5.84% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.22% | 15.22% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.60% | 18.29% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 15.54% | +0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 29.42% | -13.63% |
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UB02.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TPXG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UB02.L vs. TPXG.L - Dividend Comparison
UB02.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, while TPXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPXG.L Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UB02.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 1.65% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 1.82% | 1.99% | 1.58% | 1.62% | 1.75% | 1.56% | 1.30% | 1.45% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, UB02.L and TPXG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UB02.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB02.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TPXG.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for UB02.L and 0.20% for TPXG.L.
Find the right allocation for UB02.L and TPXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer