PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UB01.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB01.L (UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and LCPE.L (Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - UB01.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LCPE.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB01.L returned 11.99%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for LCPE.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB01.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LCPE.L.

Performance

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB01.L achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, UB01.L has outperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 11.99%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.16% annualized return.

UB01.L

1D
0.60%
1M
4.75%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.48%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
11.99%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		6.40%28.34%6.43%19.85%-4.38%14.47%4.04%16.99%-6.90%18.45%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS		14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between UB01.L and LCPE.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.22

Over the past year, UB01.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.22, meaning their price movements have been converging.

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UB01.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

25.0%

-

Industrials

21.7%
0.2%

Technology

17.8%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
32.8%

Healthcare

5.1%
32.6%

Energy

5.0%
0.0%

Utilities

4.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%
32.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Financial Services

UB01.L
25.0%
LCPE.L

-

Industrials

UB01.L
21.7%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Technology

UB01.L
17.8%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

UB01.L
9.6%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

UB01.L
5.4%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Healthcare

UB01.L
5.1%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Energy

UB01.L
5.0%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Utilities

UB01.L
4.6%
LCPE.L

-

Basic Materials

UB01.L
3.5%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Communication Services

UB01.L
2.4%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Real Estate

UB01.L

-

LCPE.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS

Often compared with UB01.L:
UB01.L vs. PSRE.LUB01.L vs. SPYUB01.L vs. LDEG.LUB01.L vs. SCHDUB01.L vs. IEURUB01.L vs. EUFM.LUB01.L vs. UC96.L
Often compared with LCPE.L:
LCPE.L vs. VOOLCPE.L vs. WDEP.LLCPE.L vs. EDIV.LLCPE.L vs. UB17.LLCPE.L vs. EMID.LLCPE.L vs. MMS.LLCPE.L vs. HDEU.L

Return for Risk

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UB01.L
UB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UB01.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.44

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.12
3.49

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

4.13

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

13.66

-7.24

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB01.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB01.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UB01.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.44

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

1.04

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.68

1.20

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.98

+0.62

Drawdowns

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB01.L drawdown since its inception was -29.27%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB01.L and LCPE.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UB01.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.27%

-27.05%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-6.66%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-12.39%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.12%

-12.39%

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.27%

-27.05%

-2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-2.71%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-3.52%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.02%

+1.90%

Volatility

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) at 3.81%. This indicates that UB01.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCPE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UB01.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

3.81%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

8.48%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

11.29%

+4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.79%

17.74%

+9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

20.60%

+10.54%

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB01.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

UB01.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

UB01.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, while LCPE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		2.56%2.43%3.13%2.86%2.78%1.94%1.93%3.04%2.77%2.89%3.55%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

UB01.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB01.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB01.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UB01.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB01.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer