UB01.L vs. JPSR.L
UB01.L (UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and JPSR.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) are both exchange-traded funds - UB01.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while JPSR.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB01.L returned 11.99%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for JPSR.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB01.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for JPSR.L.
Performance
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UB01.L achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than JPSR.L's 11.27% return. Over the past 10 years, UB01.L has outperformed JPSR.L with an annualized return of 11.99%, while JPSR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.71% annualized return.
UB01.L
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
JPSR.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- 1Y
- 28.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.71%
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB01.L UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 6.40% | 28.34% | 6.43% | 19.85% | -4.38% | 14.47% | 4.04% | 16.99% | -6.90% | 18.45% |
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 11.27% | 18.27% | 8.64% | 7.70% | -9.85% | -3.37% | 16.62% | 21.49% | -11.09% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between UB01.L and JPSR.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2015 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, UB01.L and JPSR.L have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Industrials
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Technology
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Consumer Cyclical
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Consumer Defensive
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Healthcare
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Energy
UB01.L
JPSR.L
-
Utilities
UB01.L
JPSR.L
-
Basic Materials
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Communication Services
UB01.L
JPSR.L
Real Estate
UB01.L
-
JPSR.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L — Risk / Return Rank
UB01.L
JPSR.L
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UB01.L | JPSR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 2.61 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | 8.53 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UB01.L | JPSR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.58 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.48 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.68 | 0.57 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.63 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UB01.L drawdown since its inception was -29.27%, which is greater than JPSR.L's maximum drawdown of -23.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB01.L and JPSR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UB01.L | JPSR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.27% | -23.05% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.38% | -10.84% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.55% | -13.83% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -21.57% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.27% | -23.05% | -6.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.22% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -6.89% | +2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 3.31% | +0.61% |
Volatility
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (JPSR.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that UB01.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPSR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UB01.L | JPSR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.74% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.76% | 14.41% | -1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 17.92% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.79% | 15.72% | +11.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 17.70% | +13.44% |
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UB01.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPSR.L's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UB01.L vs. JPSR.L - Dividend Comparison
UB01.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than JPSR.L's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSR.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis | 1.03% | 1.74% | 1.67% | 1.60% | 1.71% | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.58% | 1.42% | 1.16% | 0.00% |
UB01.L UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis | 2.56% | 2.43% | 3.13% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 3.04% | 2.77% | 2.89% | 3.55% | 3.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UB01.L and JPSR.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB01.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB01.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for JPSR.L.
UB01.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while JPSR.L is Japan Equities. UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while JPSR.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UB01.L and 0.22% for JPSR.L.
Find the right allocation for UB01.L and JPSR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer