UAUG vs. MMAX
UAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August) and MMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UAUG is passively managed, while MMAX is actively managed. Over the past year, UAUG returned 15.19% vs 7.67% for MMAX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MMAX.
Performance
UAUG vs. MMAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAUG achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than MMAX's 3.09% return.
UAUG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
MMAX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAUG vs. MMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 4.84% | 14.91% |
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 3.09% | 5.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAUG and MMAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between UAUG and MMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAUG vs. MMAX — Risk / Return Rank
UAUG
MMAX
UAUG vs. MMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAUG | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 2.51 | -0.94 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | 22.49 | -18.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.38 | 112.49 | -92.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAUG | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 5.52 | -2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 3.13 | -2.22 |
Drawdowns
UAUG vs. MMAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAUG drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, which is greater than MMAX's maximum drawdown of -1.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAUG and MMAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAUG | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -1.93% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | -0.34% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.13% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -0.10% | -2.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.07% | +0.68% |
Volatility
UAUG vs. MMAX - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) has a higher volatility of 0.60% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF (MMAX) at 0.36%. This indicates that UAUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAUG | MMAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 0.36% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | 0.96% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.51% | 1.39% | +4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 2.49% | +5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 2.49% | +6.23% |
UAUG vs. MMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UAUG vs. MMAX - Dividend Comparison
UAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | 1.27% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UAUG and MMAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAUG has higher volatility (0.60%) compared to MMAX (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAUG dropped -13.91% vs MMAX's -1.93%.
On 1-year performance, UAUG leads with 15.19% vs 7.67% for MMAX. On fees, MMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UAUG has performed better with a 15.19% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UAUG.
MMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for UAUG.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UAUG and 0.50% for MMAX.
MMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.52 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAUG and MMAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer