UAPR vs. ZMAY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY).

UAPR and ZMAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Mar 29, 2019. ZMAY is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on May 1, 2025.

Performance

UAPR vs. ZMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UAPR vs. ZMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	1.83%	9.71%
ZMAY Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May	0.70%	4.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than ZMAY's 0.70% return.

UAPR

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 11.75%
• 3Y*: 10.19%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: —

ZMAY

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 2.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAPR vs. ZMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UAPR and ZMAY have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

UAPR

Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April

ZMAY

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May

Return for Risk

UAPR vs. ZMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAPR

UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 88
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAPR vs. ZMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May (ZMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAPR	ZMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.95	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAPR	ZMAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	3.96	-3.44

Correlation

The correlation between UAPR and ZMAY is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

UAPR vs. ZMAY - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAPR nor ZMAY has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.17%
ZMAY Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UAPR vs. ZMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, which is greater than ZMAY's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and ZMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAPR	ZMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.61%	-0.39%	-14.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-0.05%	-3.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UAPR	ZMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.16%	1.51%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	1.51%	+5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.50%	1.51%	+6.99%