U10C.L vs. VUTA.L
U10C.L (Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc) and VUTA.L (Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Government Bonds funds - U10C.L tracks the Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index while VUTA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, U10C.L returned -0.64%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for VUTA.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. U10C.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VUTA.L.
Performance
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
U10C.L is traded in USD, while VUTA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUTA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, U10C.L achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VUTA.L's -0.21% return.
U10C.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUTA.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.51%
- 3Y*
- 2.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.40%
- 10Y*
- —
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U10C.L Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc | -1.06% | 5.51% | -5.71% | 2.61% | -28.28% | -1.82% |
VUTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating | -0.21% | 6.34% | 0.80% | 3.29% | -12.37% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between U10C.L and VUTA.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between U10C.L and VUTA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
U10C.L
VUTA.L
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| U10C.L | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.12 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.13 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 3.29 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| U10C.L | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.16 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum U10C.L drawdown since its inception was -40.18%, which is greater than VUTA.L's maximum drawdown of -19.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10C.L and VUTA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| U10C.L | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.18% | -19.22% | -20.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -3.10% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -5.46% | -11.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.22% | -7.43% | -22.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -8.42% | -18.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 1.07% | +1.58% |
Volatility
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) at 1.52%. This indicates that U10C.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| U10C.L | VUTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.52% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 3.71% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 5.01% | +3.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 7.03% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 7.21% | +6.77% |
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
U10C.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VUTA.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
U10C.L vs. VUTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither U10C.L nor VUTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
U10C.L and VUTA.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUTA.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUTA.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for U10C.L.
U10C.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10C.L and 0.05% for VUTA.L.
Find the right allocation for U10C.L and VUTA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer