PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U10C.L vs. SP5L.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U10C.L is traded in USD, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U10C.L achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SP5L.L's 9.12% return.


U10C.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.06%
6M
-1.92%
YTD
-2.19%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
-0.78%
5Y*
10Y*

SP5L.L

1D
-1.12%
1M
0.37%
6M
8.22%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
13.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
U10C.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc
-2.19%5.49%-5.72%2.66%-28.78%-0.29%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
9.12%17.77%25.48%26.33%-18.58%7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between U10C.L and SP5L.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.05

Over the past year, U10C.L and SP5L.L have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U10C.L
U10C.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
U10C.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U10C.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
U10C.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
U10C.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
U10C.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5L.L
SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


U10C.LSP5L.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

2.27

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

9.35

-7.86

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U10C.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U10C.L and SP5L.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U10C.L drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10C.L and SP5L.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U10C.LSP5L.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.19%

-33.49%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

-8.86%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.12%

-19.21%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.01%

-1.65%

-29.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.89%

-6.56%

-20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.15%

+0.78%

Volatility

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) is 2.43%, while Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that U10C.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SP5L.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U10C.LSP5L.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

3.33%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

8.80%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

11.65%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

19.83%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

18.94%

-5.11%

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

U10C.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

U10C.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither U10C.L nor SP5L.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


U10C.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, U10C.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

U10C.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SP5L.L.

U10C.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. U10C.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10C.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U10C.L and SP5L.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer