PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U10C.L vs. IDTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IDTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U10C.L is traded in USD, while IDTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IDTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U10C.L achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than IDTG.L's -1.00% return.


U10C.L

1D
0.35%
1M
0.63%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-0.98%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
-0.64%
5Y*
10Y*

IDTG.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-1.00%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
2.91%
3Y*
0.41%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
U10C.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc
-1.06%5.51%-5.71%2.61%-28.28%-1.82%
IDTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
-1.00%11.68%-9.14%5.93%-38.84%-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between U10C.L and IDTG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021

0.87

The correlation between U10C.L and IDTG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U10C.L
U10C.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
U10C.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U10C.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
U10C.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
U10C.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
U10C.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IDTG.L
IDTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
IDTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IDTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U10C.LIDTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.05

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

0.35

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

0.84

+0.75

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U10C.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the IDTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U10C.L and IDTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U10C.LIDTG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.22

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

-0.24

-0.26

Drawdowns

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U10C.L drawdown since its inception was -40.18%, smaller than the maximum IDTG.L drawdown of -54.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10C.L and IDTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U10C.LIDTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.18%

-54.06%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.99%

-8.28%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

-23.42%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.22%

-42.25%

+12.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.31%

-31.66%

+4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.47%

-0.82%

Volatility

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) is 3.14%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IDTG.L) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that U10C.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U10C.LIDTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

4.43%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

8.82%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

12.96%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

18.40%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

18.95%

-4.97%

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

U10C.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

U10C.L vs. IDTG.L - Dividend Comparison

U10C.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IDTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.24%4.20%4.64%3.69%3.04%1.74%1.79%
U10C.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


U10C.L and IDTG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, U10C.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

U10C.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IDTG.L.

U10C.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while IDTG.L is Long-Term Bond. U10C.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while IDTG.L tracks ICE US Treasury 20+ Year (GBP Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10C.L and 0.10% for IDTG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U10C.L and IDTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer