U10C.L vs. CYGB.L
U10C.L (Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc) and CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - U10C.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, U10C.L returned -0.78%/yr vs 7.75%/yr for CYGB.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. U10C.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CYGB.L.
Performance
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
U10C.L is traded in USD, while CYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, U10C.L achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than CYGB.L's 3.39% return.
U10C.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- 6M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- -0.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CYGB.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U10C.L Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc | -2.19% | 5.49% | -5.72% | 2.66% | -28.78% | -0.29% |
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.39% | 9.91% | 9.53% | 12.79% | -8.81% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between U10C.L and CYGB.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
U10C.L
CYGB.L
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| U10C.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.97 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.49 | 2.20 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum U10C.L drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, which is greater than CYGB.L's maximum drawdown of -22.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10C.L and CYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| U10C.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.19% | -22.10% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -4.04% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.12% | -6.48% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.01% | -0.67% | -30.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.89% | -4.36% | -22.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 1.78% | +1.15% |
Volatility
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) at 1.86%. This indicates that U10C.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| U10C.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 1.86% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 5.73% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.75% | 7.40% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 8.87% | +4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 8.74% | +5.09% |
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
U10C.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
U10C.L vs. CYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
U10C.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CYGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% |
U10C.L Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
U10C.L and CYGB.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, U10C.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
U10C.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
U10C.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. U10C.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10C.L and 0.40% for CYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for U10C.L and CYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer