U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

U-UN.TO (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both funds - U-UN.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, U-UN.TO returned 15.97%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for CASH.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. U-UN.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.

Performance

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-UN.TO achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's 0.83% return.

U-UN.TO

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -1.20%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 22.39%
• 3Y*: 15.97%
• 5Y*: 35.74%
• 10Y*: 20.38%

CASH.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 2.22%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
U-UN.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	1.68%	7.92%	-12.03%	78.52%	14.05%	-0.79%
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	0.83%	2.45%	4.53%	5.11%	2.39%	0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between U-UN.TO and CASH.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.01

Return for Risk

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-UN.TO

U-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9
U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
U-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
U-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9
U-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
U-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CASH.TO

CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	U-UN.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	10.33	-9.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	32.48	-31.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	7.47	-6.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.03	111.49	-110.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.13	468.24	-466.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 10.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-UN.TO and CASH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	U-UN.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	10.33	-9.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	5.52	-5.33

Drawdowns

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-UN.TO and CASH.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	U-UN.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.06%	-0.80%	-82.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.81%	-0.02%	-21.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-45.84%	-0.06%	-45.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.27%	0.00%	-19.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.87%	-0.00%	-51.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.52%	0.00%	+10.52%

Volatility

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that U-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	U-UN.TO	CASH.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.68%	0.06%	+7.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.47%	0.13%	+24.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.17%	0.22%	+33.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.21%	0.61%	+65.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.81%	0.61%	+50.20%

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

U-UN.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

U-UN.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison

U-UN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	2.19%	2.53%	4.37%	5.06%	2.30%	0.10%
U-UN.TO Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both U-UN.TO and CASH.TO in my portfolio?

U-UN.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.