PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-UN.TO vs. BIPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while BIPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BIPC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-UN.TO achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than BIPC's -5.94% return.


U-UN.TO

1D
-2.26%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
1.68%
6M
8.17%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
35.74%
10Y*
20.38%

BIPC

1D
0.58%
1M
14.90%
YTD
-5.94%
6M
-10.40%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
U-UN.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
1.68%7.92%5.21%
BIPC
Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation
-5.94%12.89%4.53%

Correlation

The correlation between U-UN.TO and BIPC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-UN.TO
U-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BIPC
BIPC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
BIPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIPC Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BIPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIPC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U-UN.TOBIPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.25

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

0.73

+1.40

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the BIPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-UN.TO and BIPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U-UN.TOBIPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.26

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.27

-0.08

Drawdowns

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than BIPC's maximum drawdown of -29.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-UN.TO and BIPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-UN.TOBIPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.06%

-29.21%

-53.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.81%

-29.21%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-15.36%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-8.46%

-43.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.52%

9.82%

+0.70%

Volatility

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC) at 6.94%. This indicates that U-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-UN.TOBIPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

6.94%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.47%

22.05%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.17%

27.26%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.21%

28.64%

+37.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.81%

28.64%

+22.17%

Dividends

U-UN.TO vs. BIPC - Dividend Comparison

U-UN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.


Frequently Asked Questions


U-UN.TO and BIPC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-UN.TO and BIPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer