PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXXI vs. SMMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXXI vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF (TXXI) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXXI achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly higher than SMMU's 1.12% return.


TXXI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.45%
6M
2.04%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMMU

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.32%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXXI vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TXXI and SMMU is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXXI vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXXI
TXXI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TXXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXXI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TXXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXXI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMU
SMMU Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SMMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMU Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXXI vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF (TXXI) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXXISMMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.89

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

5.04

-2.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

18.00

-10.88

TXXI vs. SMMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the SMMU Sharpe Ratio of 3.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXXI and SMMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXXISMMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

3.79

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.60

+0.78

Drawdowns

TXXI vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXXI drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum SMMU drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXXI and SMMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXXISMMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-5.09%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-0.77%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.01%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.55%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.22%

+0.72%

Volatility

TXXI vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF (TXXI) has a higher volatility of 0.84% compared to PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) at 0.31%. This indicates that TXXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXXISMMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.31%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

0.79%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

1.02%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.46%

1.67%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.46%

2.73%

+0.73%

TXXI vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TXXI and SMMU have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

TXXI vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison

TXXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than SMMU's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMMU
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF
2.84%2.80%3.03%2.79%1.37%0.60%1.19%1.82%1.57%1.41%1.03%0.89%
TXXI
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Aware Intermediate Duration ETF
3.46%2.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXXI and SMMU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXXI has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to SMMU (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXXI dropped -3.08% vs SMMU's -5.09%.

On 1-year performance, TXXI leads with 6.65% vs 3.86% for SMMU. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SMMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TXXI has performed better with a 6.65% return vs 3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TXXI and SMMU have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

TXXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.84% for SMMU.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and PIMCO.

SMMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXXI and SMMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer