PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXS vs. AVMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXS vs. AVMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than AVMC's 12.31% return.


TXS

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
11.66%
6M
10.21%
1Y
15.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVMC

1D
-0.79%
1M
1.58%
YTD
12.31%
6M
10.80%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXS vs. AVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TXS
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
11.66%10.31%24.29%12.83%
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
12.31%9.98%16.84%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between TXS and AVMC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.87

The correlation between TXS and AVMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

TXS vs. AVMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TXS
AVMC

Energy

19.1%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

17.0%
10.9%

Technology

15.1%
14.6%

Industrials

14.6%
19.3%

Real Estate

12.1%
0.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.2%

Financial Services

7.0%
15.8%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
6.8%

Utilities

1.7%
5.3%

Basic Materials

0.3%
5.3%

Energy

TXS
19.1%
AVMC
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TXS
17.0%
AVMC
10.9%

Technology

TXS
15.1%
AVMC
14.6%

Industrials

TXS
14.6%
AVMC
19.3%

Real Estate

TXS
12.1%
AVMC
0.6%

Healthcare

TXS
9.0%
AVMC
10.2%

Financial Services

TXS
7.0%
AVMC
15.8%

Communication Services

TXS
2.4%
AVMC
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

TXS
1.7%
AVMC
6.8%

Utilities

TXS
1.7%
AVMC
5.3%

Basic Materials

TXS
0.3%
AVMC
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXS vs. AVMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXS
TXS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMC
AVMC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
AVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXS vs. AVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXSAVMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.92

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

10.85

-2.73

TXS vs. AVMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the AVMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXS and AVMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXS vs. AVMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum AVMC drawdown of -21.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and AVMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXSAVMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-21.84%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-7.90%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.21%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-3.17%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

2.12%

-0.19%

Volatility

TXS vs. AVMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) is 3.20%, while Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (AVMC) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that TXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXSAVMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

4.16%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

10.36%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

14.03%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.84%

16.95%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.84%

16.95%

-1.11%

TXS vs. AVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMC's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXS vs. AVMC - Dividend Comparison

TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than AVMC's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVMC
Avantis U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.22%1.12%1.02%0.24%
TXS
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
0.75%0.82%0.86%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXS and AVMC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVMC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to TXS (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs AVMC's -21.84%.

On 1-year performance, AVMC leads with 22.96% vs 15.65% for TXS. On fees, AVMC is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMC has performed better with a 22.96% return vs 15.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMC is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for TXS.

AVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.75% for TXS.

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.20% for AVMC.

AVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXS and AVMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer