TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO
TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) and XEXP.TO (iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TXF.TO is actively managed, while XEXP.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TXF.TO returned 33.10%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for XEXP.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TXF.TO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for XEXP.TO.
Performance
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXF.TO achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly higher than XEXP.TO's 21.53% return.
TXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 31.92%
- 1Y
- 64.62%
- 3Y*
- 33.10%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
XEXP.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 11.43%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 41.18%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 31.75% | 24.81% | 18.69% | 60.80% | -17.90% |
XEXP.TO iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF | 21.53% | 13.97% | 9.27% | 24.40% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXF.TO and XEXP.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TXF.TO
XEXP.TO
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXF.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.24 | 2.51 | +0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | 3.36 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.48 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 3.42 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.54 | 10.64 | +4.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXF.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 2.51 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.92 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, which is greater than XEXP.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXF.TO and XEXP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXF.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.23% | -22.44% | -18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.43% | -12.10% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.38% | -22.44% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -3.99% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 3.88% | +0.29% |
Volatility
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF (XEXP.TO) have volatilities of 5.71% and 5.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXF.TO | XEXP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 5.54% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 12.89% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 16.48% | +3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.63% | 18.92% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 18.92% | +4.62% |
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TXF.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than XEXP.TO's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
TXF.TO vs. XEXP.TO - Dividend Comparison
TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than XEXP.TO's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 9.11% | 10.59% | 9.76% | 7.48% | 14.13% | 7.77% | 11.01% | 7.29% | 9.29% | 4.89% | 6.16% | 6.15% |
XEXP.TO iShares Exponential Technologies Index ETF | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.80% | 0.63% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXF.TO and XEXP.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEXP.TO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEXP.TO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for TXF.TO.
They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for TXF.TO and 0.44% for XEXP.TO.
Find the right allocation for TXF.TO and XEXP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer