PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) and FDN.TO (First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TXF.TO is actively managed, while FDN.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TXF.TO returned 17.82%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for FDN.TO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXF.TO achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than FDN.TO's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, TXF.TO has outperformed FDN.TO with an annualized return of 17.82%, while FDN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return.

TXF.TO

1D
-1.01%
1M
-8.60%
6M
12.82%
YTD
15.69%
1Y
35.03%
3Y*
24.60%
5Y*
14.76%
10Y*
17.82%

FDN.TO

1D
-3.04%
1M
0.66%
6M
2.99%
YTD
1.49%
1Y
2.55%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common		15.69%24.80%18.69%60.80%-35.54%26.82%32.50%26.56%-6.78%33.65%
FDN.TO
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF		1.49%5.45%41.28%49.01%-43.35%-5.63%6.27%15.99%-7.91%1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TXF.TO and FDN.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.24

The correlation between TXF.TO and FDN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common

First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF

Often compared with TXF.TO:
TXF.TO vs. QQQY.TOTXF.TO vs. HDIV.TOTXF.TO vs. QQCL.TOTXF.TO vs. XEQT.TOTXF.TO vs. HXQ.TOTXF.TO vs. HTAE.TOTXF.TO vs. VFV.TO
Often compared with FDN.TO:
FDN.TO vs. ETP.TOFDN.TO vs. FHG.TOFDN.TO vs. FHH.TOFDN.TO vs. FHQ.TOFDN.TO vs. FINT.TOFDN.TO vs. FST.TOFDN.TO vs. TLF.TO

Return for Risk

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TXF.TO
TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
FDN.TO
FDN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FDN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TXF.TOFDN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.42
0.13

+1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.85
0.31

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.04

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

0.12

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.49

0.27

+7.22

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the FDN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXF.TO and FDN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, smaller than the maximum FDN.TO drawdown of -50.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXF.TO and FDN.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TXF.TOFDN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

-50.44%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-21.40%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-26.31%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.23%

-50.44%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

-50.44%

+9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.19%

-6.02%

-6.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-10.73%

+4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.69%

9.45%

-4.76%

Volatility

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF (FDN.TO) at 5.37%. This indicates that TXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TXF.TOFDN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.32%

5.37%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.78%

16.68%

+5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

20.01%

+4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.47%

26.14%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.93%

21.16%

+2.77%

Dividends

TXF.TO vs. FDN.TO - Dividend Comparison

TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, while FDN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDN.TO
First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.65%5.69%1.47%1.40%1.76%1.51%1.50%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common		9.82%10.59%9.75%7.48%14.13%7.77%11.01%7.29%9.29%4.89%6.16%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

TXF.TO and FDN.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and First Trust.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXF.TO and FDN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer