TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO
TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) and CCOM.TO (CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - TXF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by CI, while CCOM.TO is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity Excess Return Index. TXF.TO is actively managed, while CCOM.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TXF.TO returned 23.28%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for CCOM.TO. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TXF.TO charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for CCOM.TO.
Performance
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TXF.TO having a 14.26% return and CCOM.TO slightly lower at 14.17%.
TXF.TO
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -7.56%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 17.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.65%
CCOM.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 9.39%
- YTD
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 23.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$73.22K | CA$113.43K | CA$307.55K | |
| CA$1.03M | CA$1.20M | CA$865.03K |
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 14.26% | 24.80% | 18.69% | 60.80% | 2.70% |
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 14.17% | 6.96% | 5.90% | -2.46% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXF.TO and CCOM.TO is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2022 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TXF.TO
CCOM.TO
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TXF.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.70 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 7.92 | -1.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, which is greater than CCOM.TO's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXF.TO and CCOM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXF.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.23% | -9.79% | -31.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.27% | -7.73% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.38% | -8.18% | -19.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.27% | -4.41% | -8.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -3.07% | -3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 2.70% | +2.66% |
Volatility
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units (CCOM.TO) at 2.70%. This indicates that TXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXF.TO | CCOM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.43% | 2.70% | +7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.79% | 8.06% | +14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.98% | 10.24% | +15.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 8.45% | +17.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 8.45% | +15.60% |
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TXF.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOM.TO's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
TXF.TO vs. CCOM.TO - Dividend Comparison
TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, less than CCOM.TO's 13.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOM.TO CI Auspice Broad Commodity Fund ETF Hedged Units | 13.17% | 3.48% | 6.99% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common | 11.84% | 10.59% | 9.75% | 7.48% | 14.13% | 7.77% | 11.01% | 7.29% | 9.29% | 4.89% | 6.16% | 6.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXF.TO and CCOM.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TXF.TO is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CCOM.TO.
TXF.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while CCOM.TO is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for TXF.TO and 0.73% for CCOM.TO.
Find the right allocation for TXF.TO and CCOM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer