PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXF.TO achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than BTCX-B.TO's -26.95% return.


TXF.TO

1D
0.61%
1M
-7.56%
6M
11.76%
YTD
14.26%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
17.47%
ALL TIME*
15.65%

BTCX-B.TO

1D
-2.81%
1M
-0.23%
6M
-17.61%
YTD
-26.95%
1Y
-44.02%
3Y*
30.49%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$935.28KCA$1.05MCA$1.72M
CA$1.03MCA$1.20MCA$865.03K

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common
14.26%24.80%18.69%60.80%-35.54%30.42%
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
-26.95%-11.32%139.01%149.40%-62.06%-18.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TXF.TO and BTCX-B.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2021

0.34

The correlation between TXF.TO and BTCX-B.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TXF.TO
TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BTCX-B.TO
BTCX-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTCX-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXF.TOBTCX-B.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.83

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

-0.87

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.35

-1.31

+7.66

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the BTCX-B.TO Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXF.TO and BTCX-B.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, smaller than the maximum BTCX-B.TO drawdown of -75.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXF.TO and BTCX-B.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXF.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.23%

-75.26%

+34.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.27%

-52.71%

+34.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-52.71%

+25.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.23%

-75.26%

+34.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.27%

-49.98%

+36.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-33.43%

+27.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

35.25%

-29.89%

Volatility

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units (BTCX-B.TO) at 8.27%. This indicates that TXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCX-B.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXF.TOBTCX-B.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

8.27%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.79%

33.34%

-10.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.98%

43.84%

-17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

52.26%

-26.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

54.52%

-30.47%

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXF.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCX-B.TO's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXF.TO vs. BTCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.84%, while BTCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTCX-B.TO
CI Galaxy Bitcoin ETF C$ Unhedged Series Units
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common
11.84%10.59%9.75%7.48%14.13%7.77%11.01%7.29%9.29%4.89%6.16%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXF.TO and BTCX-B.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TXF.TO is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

TXF.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while BTCX-B.TO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for TXF.TO and 0.80% for BTCX-B.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXF.TO and BTCX-B.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer