TXBC vs. TKNS
TXBC (21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF) and TKNS (21Shares Active Crypto ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from 21Shares. TXBC is passively managed, while TKNS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
TXBC vs. TKNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TXBC
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -16.89%
- YTD
- -40.49%
- 6M
- -40.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TKNS
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -13.52%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TXBC vs. TKNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TXBC 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF | -23.35% |
TKNS 21Shares Active Crypto ETF | -18.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXBC and TKNS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXBC vs. TKNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 ex-BTC Index ETF (TXBC) and 21Shares Active Crypto ETF (TKNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TXBC vs. TKNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXBC drawdown since its inception was -53.45%, which is greater than TKNS's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXBC and TKNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXBC | TKNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.45% | -22.36% | -31.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.25% | -19.70% | -31.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.59% | -12.49% | -19.10% |
Volatility
TXBC vs. TKNS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXBC | TKNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.86% | 46.24% | +16.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 46.24% | +16.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.86% | 46.24% | +16.62% |
Dividends
TXBC vs. TKNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TXBC nor TKNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, TXBC and TKNS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TXBC and TKNS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for TXBC and TKNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer