TWN vs. GAM
TWN (The Taiwan Fund Inc.) is Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Nomura Asset Management, while GAM (General American Investors Company, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TWN returned 30.17%/yr vs 15.46%/yr for GAM. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TWN vs. GAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWN achieves a 90.00% return, which is significantly higher than GAM's 8.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TWN has outperformed GAM with an annualized return of 30.17%, while GAM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.46% annualized return.
TWN
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 8.54%
- YTD
- 90.00%
- 6M
- 99.81%
- 1Y
- 195.95%
- 3Y*
- 66.17%
- 5Y*
- 35.51%
- 10Y*
- 30.17%
GAM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 29.55%
- 3Y*
- 27.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
TWN vs. GAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWN The Taiwan Fund Inc. | 90.00% | 54.11% | 32.76% | 51.73% | -38.54% | 58.14% | 40.71% | 47.00% | -19.15% | 33.80% |
GAM General American Investors Company, Inc. | 8.22% | 28.63% | 29.55% | 26.84% | -14.84% | 20.56% | 5.85% | 41.76% | -10.25% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWN and GAM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 1989 | 0.36 |
The correlation between TWN and GAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWN vs. GAM — Risk / Return Rank
TWN
GAM
TWN vs. GAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) and General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TWN | GAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 7.36 | 2.72 | +4.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.40 | 3.80 | +3.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.02 | 1.50 | +0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.97 | 3.42 | +18.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 72.01 | 17.24 | +54.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TWN | GAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.36 | 2.72 | +4.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.50 | 0.94 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.34 | 0.88 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.45 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
TWN vs. GAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWN drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, which is greater than GAM's maximum drawdown of -66.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWN and GAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWN | GAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.52% | -66.63% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -8.67% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.97% | -14.90% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.72% | -26.09% | -25.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.72% | -41.78% | -9.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.55% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -11.57% | -25.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.72% | +1.05% |
Volatility
TWN vs. GAM - Volatility Comparison
The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to General American Investors Company, Inc. (GAM) at 2.92%. This indicates that TWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWN | GAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.85% | 2.92% | +8.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.86% | 8.99% | +13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.81% | 10.90% | +15.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.87% | 15.97% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 17.63% | +4.89% |
Dividends
TWN vs. GAM - Dividend Comparison
TWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than GAM's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAM General American Investors Company, Inc. | 10.07% | 11.32% | 8.82% | 6.17% | 4.15% | 1.38% | 6.72% | 6.49% | 9.67% | 9.56% | 10.20% | 3.60% |
TWN The Taiwan Fund Inc. | 6.11% | 11.62% | 19.14% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 7.78% | 12.91% | 8.26% | 11.27% | 3.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWN and GAM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TWN has higher volatility (11.85%) compared to GAM (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWN dropped -79.52% vs GAM's -66.63%.
TWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.36 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWN and GAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer