PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TVC vs. ^N225
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TVC vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tennessee Valley Authority PARRS D 2028 (TVC) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TVC is traded in USD, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TVC achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than ^N225's 20.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TVC has underperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 2.00%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively higher 9.08% annualized return.


TVC

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.04%
6M
-0.34%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
2.00%
ALL TIME*
5.45%

^N225

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.16%
6M
12.47%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
40.01%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
9.08%
ALL TIME*
5.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.65B$64.15B$69.97B
$312.15K$230.96K$443.64K

TVC vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TVC
Tennessee Valley Authority PARRS D 2028
0.94%9.18%0.12%6.56%-13.27%4.49%-1.73%11.76%2.11%4.99%
^N225
Nikkei 225
20.44%26.56%7.17%19.21%-20.48%-5.90%22.42%19.73%-10.20%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TVC and ^N225 is -0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TVC vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TVC
TVC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TVC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TVC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

^N225
^N225 Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
^N225 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^N225 Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
^N225 Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
^N225 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
^N225 Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TVC vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tennessee Valley Authority PARRS D 2028 (TVC) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TVC^N225Difference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

2.74

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

8.27

-5.49

TVC vs. ^N225 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TVC Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the ^N225 Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TVC and ^N225, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TVC vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TVC drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TVC and ^N225.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TVC^N225Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.14%

-51.91%

+26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.24%

-16.07%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-24.78%

+20.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.14%

-36.26%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.14%

-37.97%

+12.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-13.47%

+10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-13.42%

+8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

5.27%

-4.27%

Volatility

TVC vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tennessee Valley Authority PARRS D 2028 (TVC) is 0.86%, while Nikkei 225 (^N225) has a volatility of 9.81%. This indicates that TVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^N225 based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TVC^N225Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

9.81%

-8.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

23.83%

-20.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

28.40%

-22.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.63%

24.38%

-13.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

21.82%

-10.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


TVC and ^N225 have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^N225 has higher volatility (9.81%) compared to TVC (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TVC dropped -25.14% vs ^N225's -51.91%.

^N225 currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TVC and ^N225

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer