PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSK vs. CMCX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TUSK is traded in USD, while CMCX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMCX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSK achieves a 77.84% return, which is significantly higher than CMCX.L's 54.48% return.


TUSK

1D
3.13%
1M
2.81%
YTD
77.84%
6M
85.88%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
-10.70%
5Y*
-3.15%
10Y*

CMCX.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
23.12%
YTD
54.48%
6M
63.17%
1Y
90.70%
3Y*
49.85%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
9.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
77.84%-38.33%-32.74%-48.44%375.27%-59.10%102.27%-87.59%-7.67%29.14%
CMCX.L
CMC Markets plc
54.48%36.76%140.02%-48.87%-20.49%-28.90%192.62%48.98%-30.92%59.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSK and CMCX.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TUSK:

$159.01M

CMCX.L:

£1.30B

EPS

TUSK:

-$1.47

CMCX.L:

£0.50

PS Ratio

TUSK:

2.54

CMCX.L:

1.69

PB Ratio

TUSK:

0.60

CMCX.L:

2.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

TUSK:

$62.70M

CMCX.L:

£755.33M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TUSK:

$9.65M

CMCX.L:

£533.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

TUSK:

-$14.10M

CMCX.L:

£232.99M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSK vs. CMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSK
TUSK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TUSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CMCX.L
CMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSKCMCX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.46

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

4.19

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

10.78

-10.04

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the CMCX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSK and CMCX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSK drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, which is greater than CMCX.L's maximum drawdown of -82.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSK and CMCX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSKCMCX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.55%

-82.48%

-16.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.52%

-20.24%

-22.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.27%

-45.82%

-23.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.00%

-80.36%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.77%

-0.05%

-91.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.03%

-43.80%

-29.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.68%

7.88%

+15.80%

Volatility

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Volatility Comparison

Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) has a higher volatility of 22.47% compared to CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) at 17.57%. This indicates that TUSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSKCMCX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.47%

17.57%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.18%

25.50%

+29.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.95%

43.41%

+23.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.68%

48.29%

+24.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.23%

47.85%

+39.38%

Dividends

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Dividend Comparison

TUSK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CMCX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCX.L
CMC Markets plc
2.97%4.62%4.19%4.67%5.53%9.46%5.47%2.41%6.94%5.95%
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%11.36%1.39%0.00%

Financials

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and CMC Markets plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
22.03M
217.26M
(TUSK) Total Revenue
(CMCX.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TUSK values in USD, CMCX.L values in GBP

TUSK vs. CMCX.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and CMC Markets plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
71.6%
86.6%
Portfolio components
TUSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.78M and revenue of 22.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.

CMCX.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a gross profit of 188.08M and revenue of 217.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.

TUSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.

CMCX.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported an operating income of 57.64M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.

TUSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.19M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.

CMCX.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CMC Markets plc reported a net income of 38.42M and revenue of 217.26M, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TUSK and CMCX.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSK and CMCX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer