PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TURF vs. COPJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TURF vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TURF achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than COPJ's 15.22% return.


TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COPJ

1D
-4.49%
1M
13.66%
YTD
15.22%
6M
30.03%
1Y
123.62%
3Y*
45.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TURF vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
19.55%17.05%
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
15.22%87.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TURF and COPJ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.63

TURF vs. COPJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TURF
COPJ

Basic Materials

33.9%
100.0%

Energy

29.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.5%

-

Communication Services

3.8%

-

Financial Services

2.3%

-

Industrials

1.6%

-

Technology

0.4%
3.6%

Utilities

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Basic Materials

TURF
33.9%
COPJ
100.0%

Energy

TURF
29.2%
COPJ

-

Consumer Defensive

TURF
8.5%
COPJ

-

Communication Services

TURF
3.8%
COPJ

-

Financial Services

TURF
2.3%
COPJ

-

Industrials

TURF
1.6%
COPJ

-

Technology

TURF
0.4%
COPJ
3.6%

Utilities

TURF
0.3%
COPJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

TURF

-

COPJ

-

Healthcare

TURF

-

COPJ

-

Real Estate

TURF

-

COPJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TURF vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TURF

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TURF vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TURF vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TURFCOPJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

1.10

+1.42

Drawdowns

TURF vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TURF drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum COPJ drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TURF and COPJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TURFCOPJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-32.28%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-11.93%

+9.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-11.86%

+10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

Volatility

TURF vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TURFCOPJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

42.16%

-25.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

34.78%

-18.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

34.78%

-18.28%

TURF vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TURF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

TURF vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

TURF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than COPJ's 10.04% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
10.04%11.57%11.64%2.48%
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
1.25%1.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TURF and COPJ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 10.04%, compared with 1.25% for TURF.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TURF and 0.78% for COPJ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TURF and COPJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer