TUR vs. XCEM
TUR (iShares MSCI Turkey ETF) and XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - TUR tracks the MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index while XCEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TUR returned 2.47%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for XCEM. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for XCEM.
Performance
TUR vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUR achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 38.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TUR has underperformed XCEM with an annualized return of 2.47%, while XCEM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.
TUR
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- 13.80%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
XCEM
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- 38.32%
- 6M
- 44.13%
- 1Y
- 71.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
TUR vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF | 13.80% | -1.54% | 12.91% | -8.83% | 105.75% | -27.41% | -1.19% | 14.49% | -41.46% | 37.58% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 38.32% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | 7.87% | 9.47% | 19.74% | -11.75% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUR and XCEM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2015 | 0.35 |
TUR vs. XCEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUR
XCEM
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
Industrials
TUR
XCEM
Financial Services
TUR
XCEM
Consumer Defensive
TUR
XCEM
Basic Materials
TUR
XCEM
Energy
TUR
XCEM
Consumer Cyclical
TUR
XCEM
Communication Services
TUR
XCEM
Healthcare
TUR
XCEM
Utilities
TUR
XCEM
Real Estate
TUR
XCEM
Technology
TUR
XCEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUR vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank
TUR
XCEM
TUR vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUR | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.61 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 4.95 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 19.98 | -14.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUR | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 3.42 | -2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.68 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.66 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.63 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
TUR vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUR drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than XCEM's maximum drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUR and XCEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUR | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.34% | -41.24% | -31.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -14.46% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.63% | -18.92% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | -29.67% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.25% | -41.24% | -18.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.38% | -1.25% | -27.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.90% | -8.59% | -31.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 3.57% | +1.79% |
Volatility
TUR vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) has a higher volatility of 14.14% compared to Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) at 9.43%. This indicates that TUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUR | XCEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.14% | 9.43% | +4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | 18.72% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.40% | 20.89% | +4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 17.75% | +16.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.39% | 19.72% | +14.67% |
TUR vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUR vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison
TUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than XCEM's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF | 2.11% | 2.40% | 1.79% | 4.43% | 1.97% | 4.22% | 0.87% | 3.29% | 4.05% | 2.64% | 2.89% | 3.04% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.35% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUR and XCEM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUR has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to XCEM (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUR dropped -72.34% vs XCEM's -41.24%.
On 10-year performance, XCEM leads with 12.99% vs 2.47% for TUR. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, XCEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 12.99% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TUR.
XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 2.11% for TUR.
TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index, while XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TUR and 0.16% for XCEM.
XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUR and XCEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer