PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than HVOI.TO's 11.03% return.


TULV.TO

1D
0.67%
1M
0.62%
6M
4.81%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

HVOI.TO

1D
0.28%
1M
1.05%
6M
11.45%
YTD
11.03%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$34.24KCA$36.50KCA$47.47K
CA$73.40KCA$89.67KCA$94.91K

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TULV.TO and HVOI.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TULV.TO
TULV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HVOI.TO
HVOI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HVOI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TULV.TOHVOI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.01

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

12.03

-7.82

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the HVOI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TULV.TO and HVOI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than HVOI.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and HVOI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TULV.TOHVOI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-6.72%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-6.72%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.03%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-0.89%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.68%

+1.26%

Volatility

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A (HVOI.TO) at 2.18%. This indicates that TULV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HVOI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TULV.TOHVOI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

2.18%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.21%

6.92%

+2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

8.81%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.01%

8.31%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.77%

8.31%

+3.46%

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HVOI.TO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TULV.TO vs. HVOI.TO - Dividend Comparison

TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than HVOI.TO's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HVOI.TO
Harvest Low Volatility Canadian Equity Income ETF Class A
6.69%4.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
1.71%1.80%1.48%1.96%1.57%1.37%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


TULV.TO and HVOI.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TULV.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TULV.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for HVOI.TO.

TULV.TO is categorized as Low Volatility, while HVOI.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: TD and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TULV.TO and 0.89% for HVOI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TULV.TO and HVOI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer