TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TULV.TO (TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF) and FLUS.TO (Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TULV.TO is actively managed, while FLUS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TULV.TO returned 8.91%/yr vs 16.75%/yr for FLUS.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TULV.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLUS.TO.

Performance

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than FLUS.TO's 13.62% return.

TULV.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: -0.18%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: 9.27%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: —

FLUS.TO

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 13.62%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 26.86%
• 3Y*: 23.14%
• 5Y*: 16.75%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TULV.TO TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF	1.51%	3.62%	23.74%	-3.31%	2.02%	23.84%	0.90%
FLUS.TO Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF	13.62%	10.48%	34.58%	20.92%	-10.01%	25.42%	9.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TULV.TO and FLUS.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020	0.22

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TULV.TO	FLUS.TO
Consumer Defensive	24.9%	4.4%
Healthcare	20.4%	10.5%
Utilities	17.7%	1.6%
Financial Services	12.6%	9.9%
Communication Services	11.6%	12.2%
Technology	8.8%	34.3%
Industrials	3.4%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.6%	11.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	2.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Energy	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TULV.TO

TULV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 17
TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TULV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TULV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TULV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TULV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FLUS.TO

FLUS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLUS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FLUS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FLUS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FLUS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FLUS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TULV.TO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.49	2.05	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	2.93	-2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.41	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	2.92	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.85	10.86	-9.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the FLUS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TULV.TO and FLUS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TULV.TO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49	2.05	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	1.15	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.95	-0.24

Drawdowns

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum FLUS.TO drawdown of -28.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and FLUS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TULV.TO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-28.25%	+16.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-9.24%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.39%	-18.83%	+7.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.78%	-19.13%	+7.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.64%	0.00%	-5.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-3.65%	+0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.48%	+0.35%

Volatility

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLUS.TO) at 4.00%. This indicates that TULV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLUS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TULV.TO	FLUS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	4.00%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.91%	10.68%	-2.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.44%	13.18%	-2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.89%	14.63%	-2.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.62%	15.84%	-4.22%

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUS.TO's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

TULV.TO vs. FLUS.TO - Dividend Comparison

TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than FLUS.TO's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLUS.TO Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF	0.62%	0.73%	0.91%	1.20%	1.72%	1.74%	1.62%	1.83%	1.66%	0.51%
TULV.TO TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF	1.80%	1.80%	1.48%	1.96%	1.57%	1.37%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TULV.TO and FLUS.TO in my portfolio?

TULV.TO and FLUS.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TULV.TO or FLUS.TO?

On fees, FLUS.TO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TULV.TO or FLUS.TO?

FLUS.TO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TULV.TO.

What is the main difference between TULV.TO and FLUS.TO?

They also come from different issuers: TD and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TULV.TO and 0.29% for FLUS.TO.