TTXU vs. IXC
TTXU (Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. TTXU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
TTXU vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTXU achieves a 50.13% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 23.35% return.
TTXU
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- 6M
- 55.95%
- YTD
- 50.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
TTXU vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 50.13% | -14.75% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 23.35% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTXU and IXC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTXU vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
TTXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC
TTXU vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TTXU) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTXU | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTXU vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTXU drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTXU and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTXU | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -67.88% | +16.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -11.22% | -5.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.21% | -17.45% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility
TTXU vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTXU | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.88% | 19.18% | +44.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.88% | 23.45% | +40.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.88% | 26.81% | +37.07% |
TTXU vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTXU vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
TTXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than IXC's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.08% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTXU and IXC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TTXU.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.50% for TTXU.
TTXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. TTXU tracks S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TTXU and 0.40% for IXC.
Find the right allocation for TTXU and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer