PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTRZX vs. SHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTRZX achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than SHRAX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TTRZX has underperformed SHRAX with an annualized return of 1.13%, while SHRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.28% annualized return.


TTRZX

1D
1.45%
1M
1.55%
6M
1.18%
YTD
4.29%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
5.74%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
1.13%
ALL TIME*
3.78%

SHRAX

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.44%
6M
3.33%
YTD
0.24%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
7.28%
ALL TIME*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
4.29%18.26%-6.61%6.28%-12.29%-5.14%-5.58%2.01%2.03%3.09%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
0.24%13.50%12.02%24.09%-25.43%7.35%19.74%24.26%-7.93%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TTRZX and SHRAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2008

0.41

The correlation between TTRZX and SHRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (10 years) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTRZX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTRZX
TTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRAX
SHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTRZXSHRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.03

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

0.13

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

0.35

+4.60

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTRZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the SHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTRZX and SHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTRZX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum SHRAX drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTRZX and SHRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTRZXSHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-57.26%

+24.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-14.59%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.49%

-23.73%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.23%

-33.77%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.17%

-33.77%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-4.64%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.61%

-11.23%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

5.30%

-3.11%

Volatility

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) is 2.18%, while ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that TTRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTRZXSHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

3.80%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.33%

13.54%

-7.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.50%

17.56%

-10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

20.98%

-11.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

20.84%

-13.03%

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTRZX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTRZX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison

TTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than SHRAX's 22.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
22.22%22.27%20.39%13.77%15.63%26.11%18.42%12.71%18.97%5.97%4.76%4.03%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
6.90%5.57%8.19%5.95%7.54%8.18%4.84%6.96%5.55%3.54%2.94%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTRZX and SHRAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHRAX has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to TTRZX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTRZX dropped -33.17% vs SHRAX's -57.26%.

TTRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTRZX and SHRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer