TTRZX vs. RPIDX
TTRZX (Templeton Global Total Return Fund) and RPIDX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TTRZX returned -0.23%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for RPIDX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTRZX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for RPIDX.
Performance
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTRZX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than RPIDX's 0.28% return.
TTRZX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.07%
RPIDX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund | 1.77% | 18.26% | -6.61% | 6.28% | -12.29% | -5.14% | -5.58% | 0.29% |
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 0.28% | 9.74% | 9.92% | 4.72% | -0.76% | 6.21% | 2.71% | 6.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTRZX and RPIDX is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019 | 0.01 |
The correlation between TTRZX and RPIDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTRZX vs. RPIDX — Risk / Return Rank
TTRZX
RPIDX
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTRZX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.49 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 5.25 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | 13.84 | -9.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTRZX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.11 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 1.15 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.11 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTRZX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, which is greater than RPIDX's maximum drawdown of -19.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTRZX and RPIDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTRZX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.17% | -19.95% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -1.34% | -5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.49% | -3.17% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.73% | -7.31% | -20.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -0.74% | -8.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -1.87% | -5.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 0.51% | +1.45% |
Volatility
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) at 0.65%. This indicates that TTRZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTRZX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 0.65% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 2.56% | +3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.38% | 3.35% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 3.83% | +5.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 4.80% | +3.12% |
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTRZX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTRZX vs. RPIDX - Dividend Comparison
TTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than RPIDX's 9.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 9.92% | 9.91% | 9.20% | 6.64% | 7.97% | 5.34% | 7.14% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund | 6.96% | 5.57% | 8.19% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 8.18% | 4.84% | 6.96% | 5.55% | 3.54% | 2.94% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTRZX and RPIDX have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTRZX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to RPIDX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTRZX dropped -33.17% vs RPIDX's -19.95%.
RPIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTRZX and RPIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer