TTRZX vs. QFITX
TTRZX (Templeton Global Total Return Fund) and QFITX (Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TTRZX returned -0.23%/yr vs -1.43%/yr for QFITX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTRZX charges 0.89%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for QFITX.
Performance
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTRZX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than QFITX's -4.27% return.
TTRZX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 8.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.07%
QFITX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -5.50%
- 1Y
- -6.06%
- 3Y*
- -6.02%
- 5Y*
- -1.43%
- 10Y*
- —
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund | 1.77% | 18.26% | -6.61% | 6.28% | -12.29% | -5.14% | -5.58% | 2.13% |
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund | -4.27% | -7.64% | -1.03% | -6.54% | -22.87% | 36.77% | 10.36% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTRZX and QFITX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, TTRZX and QFITX have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTRZX vs. QFITX — Risk / Return Rank
TTRZX
QFITX
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) and Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTRZX | QFITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.83 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.65 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | -1.44 | +6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTRZX | QFITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | -1.03 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | -0.07 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | -0.02 | +0.49 |
Drawdowns
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTRZX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum QFITX drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTRZX and QFITX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTRZX | QFITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.17% | -38.03% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -8.67% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.49% | -20.64% | +9.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.73% | -38.03% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -37.47% | +28.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -19.29% | +11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.93% | -1.97% |
Volatility
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a higher volatility of 2.28% compared to Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX) at 1.60%. This indicates that TTRZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTRZX | QFITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | 1.60% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 4.16% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.38% | 5.47% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 21.20% | -11.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 20.26% | -12.34% |
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTRZX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than QFITX's 1.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTRZX vs. QFITX - Dividend Comparison
TTRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, less than QFITX's 13.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund | 13.28% | 12.72% | 3.70% | 0.08% | 0.15% | 29.15% | 2.12% | 4.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTRZX Templeton Global Total Return Fund | 6.96% | 5.57% | 8.19% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 8.18% | 4.84% | 6.96% | 5.55% | 3.54% | 2.94% | 4.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTRZX and QFITX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TTRZX has higher volatility (2.28%) compared to QFITX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTRZX dropped -33.17% vs QFITX's -38.03%.
TTRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TTRZX and QFITX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer