TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO
TTP.TO (TD Canadian Equity Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTP.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canada Broad Market Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TTP.TO returned 12.63%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for ZEB.TO. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TTP.TO charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTP.TO achieves a 10.77% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TTP.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 12.63%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.
TTP.TO
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 13.11%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 14.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTP.TO TD Canadian Equity Index ETF | 10.77% | 31.96% | 20.92% | 11.66% | -5.76% | 25.31% | 6.32% | 22.15% | -9.16% | 8.79% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTP.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | 0.66 |
The correlation between TTP.TO and ZEB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
Energy
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Basic Materials
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Industrials
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Technology
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Utilities
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Communication Services
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Real Estate
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Healthcare
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TTP.TO
ZEB.TO
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Canadian Equity Index ETF (TTP.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTP.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.90 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 7.17 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 30.84 | -13.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTP.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 4.79 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.94 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTP.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTP.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTP.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -39.69% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -8.44% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.21% | -14.80% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.44% | -25.97% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.03% | -39.69% | +2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -2.00% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.34% | -5.65% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TD Canadian Equity Index ETF (TTP.TO) is 3.40%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TTP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTP.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 4.89% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 11.14% | -0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 12.62% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 13.52% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 16.91% | -2.06% |
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTP.TO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TTP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
TTP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTP.TO TD Canadian Equity Index ETF | 1.88% | 2.06% | 2.56% | 2.91% | 3.68% | 1.86% | 2.84% | 2.09% | 2.89% | 2.32% | 1.85% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTP.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TTP.TO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TTP.TO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
TTP.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. TTP.TO tracks Solactive Canada Broad Market Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: TD and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TTP.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for TTP.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer