TTOP vs. EZBC
TTOP (21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - TTOP tracks the FTSE Crypto 10 Select Index while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TTOP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
TTOP vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTOP achieves a -29.59% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -27.02% return.
TTOP
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- -32.24%
- YTD
- -29.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- -29.23%
- YTD
- -27.02%
- 1Y
- -46.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTOP vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTOP 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF | -29.59% | -14.90% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -27.02% | -13.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTOP and EZBC is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTOP vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
TTOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC
TTOP vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF (TTOP) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTOP | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTOP vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTOP drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTOP and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTOP | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -53.35% | +8.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.08% | -49.20% | +9.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.54% | -17.55% | -8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.55% | — |
Volatility
TTOP vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTOP | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.51% | 44.40% | +7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.51% | 49.91% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.51% | 49.91% | +1.60% |
TTOP vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTOP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTOP vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTOP nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, TTOP and EZBC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TTOP.
TTOP and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TTOP tracks FTSE Crypto 10 Select Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TTOP and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for TTOP and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer