TTOP vs. BSCQ
TTOP (21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTOP is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the FTSE Crypto 10 Select Index, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. TTOP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTOP achieves a -29.39% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.99% return.
TTOP
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- -35.45%
- YTD
- -29.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTOP 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF | -29.39% | -14.90% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.99% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTOP and BSCQ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTOP vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
TTOP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCQ
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF (TTOP) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTOP | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 3.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 42.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 182.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTOP drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTOP and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTOP | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.86% | -16.50% | -28.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.91% | 0.00% | -39.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.94% | -2.81% | -24.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTOP | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.11% | 0.60% | +50.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.11% | 3.28% | +47.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.11% | 4.74% | +46.37% |
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTOP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTOP vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
TTOP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.10% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
TTOP 21Shares FTSE Crypto 10 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTOP and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TTOP.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.00% for TTOP.
TTOP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. TTOP tracks FTSE Crypto 10 Select Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TTOP and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for TTOP and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer