PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTMI vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTMI vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTMI achieves a 181.23% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TTMI has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 37.89%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.


TTMI

1D
3.65%
1M
14.94%
YTD
181.23%
6M
164.27%
1Y
432.81%
3Y*
140.84%
5Y*
66.64%
10Y*
37.89%

GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTMI vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTMI
TTM Technologies, Inc.
181.23%178.79%56.55%4.84%1.21%8.01%-8.34%54.68%-37.91%14.97%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TTMI and GLD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.06

The correlation between TTMI and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTMI vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTMI
TTMI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TTMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TTMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTMI vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTMIGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.18

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.76

0.98

+17.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

53.30

2.81

+50.49

TTMI vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTMI Sharpe Ratio is 5.99, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTMI and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTMI vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTMI drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTMI and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTMIGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-45.56%

-49.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.26%

-24.46%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.24%

-24.46%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.69%

-24.46%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.19%

-24.46%

-31.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-22.05%

+20.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.82%

-16.16%

-33.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.17%

8.49%

-0.32%

Volatility

TTMI vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

TTM Technologies, Inc. (TTMI) has a higher volatility of 22.89% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 7.79%. This indicates that TTMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTMIGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.89%

7.79%

+15.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.82%

24.10%

+34.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.82%

27.37%

+45.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.51%

18.22%

+31.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.57%

16.08%

+29.49%

Dividends

TTMI vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTMI nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TTMI and GLD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTMI has higher volatility (22.89%) compared to GLD (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTMI dropped -94.68% vs GLD's -45.56%.

TTMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.99 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTMI and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer