PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTEQ vs. AIBD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTEQ achieves a 38.44% return, which is significantly higher than AIBD's -38.68% return.


TTEQ

1D
-0.82%
1M
18.60%
YTD
38.44%
6M
35.90%
1Y
66.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIBD

1D
4.30%
1M
-24.36%
YTD
-38.68%
6M
-33.54%
1Y
-59.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
38.44%24.25%3.92%
AIBD
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares
-38.68%-49.15%-14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TTEQ and AIBD is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024

-0.85

The correlation between TTEQ and AIBD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTEQ vs. AIBD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTEQ
TTEQ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TTEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TTEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

AIBD
AIBD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AIBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBD Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTEQAIBDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

0.78

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

-0.97

+4.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.43

-1.78

+14.22

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the AIBD Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTEQ and AIBD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TTEQAIBDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

-1.17

+4.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

-0.95

+2.57

Drawdowns

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTEQ drawdown since its inception was -26.97%, smaller than the maximum AIBD drawdown of -82.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTEQ and AIBD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTEQAIBDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.97%

-82.11%

+55.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.31%

-61.47%

+44.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-81.34%

+80.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-48.17%

+43.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

33.38%

-28.02%

Volatility

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) is 7.97%, while Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares (AIBD) has a volatility of 14.63%. This indicates that TTEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTEQAIBDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

14.63%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.88%

37.40%

-18.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.30%

51.16%

-27.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.30%

56.52%

-29.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.30%

56.52%

-29.22%

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTEQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than AIBD's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTEQ vs. AIBD - Dividend Comparison

TTEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%.


PositionTTM20252024
AIBD
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bear 2X Shares
5.68%4.37%3.58%
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTEQ and AIBD have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIBD has higher volatility (14.63%) compared to TTEQ (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTEQ dropped -26.97% vs AIBD's -82.11%.

On 1-year performance, TTEQ leads with 66.44% vs -59.55% for AIBD. On fees, TTEQ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, TTEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TTEQ has performed better with a 66.44% return vs -59.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TTEQ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AIBD.

AIBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 0.00% for TTEQ.

TTEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIBD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for TTEQ and 1.05% for AIBD.

TTEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTEQ and AIBD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer