PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSY3.L is traded in GBP, while XUT3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUT3.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSY3.L having a 2.85% return and XUT3.L slightly lower at 2.81%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TSY3.L having a 2.12% annualized return and XUT3.L not far behind at 2.08%.


TSY3.L

1D
0.36%
1M
2.43%
YTD
2.85%
6M
3.45%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
2.12%

XUT3.L

1D
0.27%
1M
2.17%
YTD
2.81%
6M
3.25%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
2.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSY3.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
2.85%-2.01%5.77%-1.64%7.59%0.49%-0.43%0.21%7.82%-8.39%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.81%-2.42%5.95%-1.10%7.87%0.32%-0.08%-0.38%7.45%-8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TSY3.L and XUT3.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2013

0.81

The correlation between TSY3.L and XUT3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSY3.L
TSY3.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TSY3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSY3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSY3.LXUT3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

1.22

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.83

3.32

+0.51

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSY3.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSY3.L and XUT3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSY3.L drawdown since its inception was -41.41%, which is greater than XUT3.L's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSY3.L and XUT3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSY3.LXUT3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.41%

-18.58%

-22.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-5.21%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.93%

-9.27%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.38%

-16.72%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.75%

-18.58%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.90%

-6.32%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-8.04%

-11.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.91%

-0.16%

Volatility

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TSY3.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) have volatilities of 1.51% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSY3.LXUT3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.48%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

4.97%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.22%

6.40%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

8.21%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.70%

8.80%

-0.10%

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSY3.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XUT3.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TSY3.L vs. XUT3.L - Dividend Comparison

TSY3.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than XUT3.L's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TSY3.L
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.84%4.25%4.06%3.02%0.61%0.56%1.84%2.14%1.78%1.34%0.87%0.80%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSY3.L and XUT3.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSY3.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSY3.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for XUT3.L.

TSY3.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TSY3.L and 0.06% for XUT3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSY3.L and XUT3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer