TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO
TSTX-U.TO (Global X 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF) and RCDB.NEO (RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. TSTX-U.TO is passively managed, while RCDB.NEO is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSTX-U.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RCDB.NEO.
Performance
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSTX-U.TO achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than RCDB.NEO's 1.10% return.
TSTX-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RCDB.NEO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 2.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSTX-U.TO Global X 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF | 0.23% | 1.20% |
RCDB.NEO RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF | 1.10% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSTX-U.TO and RCDB.NEO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
TSTX-U.TO
RCDB.NEO
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (TSTX-U.TO) and RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSTX-U.TO | RCDB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.45 | +0.87 |
Drawdowns
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSTX-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.90%, smaller than the maximum RCDB.NEO drawdown of -8.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSTX-U.TO and RCDB.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSTX-U.TO | RCDB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -8.31% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.08% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.25% | -1.41% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.47% | — |
Volatility
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSTX-U.TO | RCDB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68% | 2.34% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 2.83% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.68% | 5.48% | -3.80% |
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSTX-U.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RCDB.NEO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TSTX-U.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Dividend Comparison
TSTX-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than RCDB.NEO's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCDB.NEO RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF | 2.11% | 1.96% | 1.58% | 1.22% | 1.16% | 1.33% | 1.68% | 0.78% |
TSTX-U.TO Global X 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF | 2.32% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSTX-U.TO and RCDB.NEO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSTX-U.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSTX-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RCDB.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TSTX-U.TO and 0.17% for RCDB.NEO.
Find the right allocation for TSTX-U.TO and RCDB.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer