PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSORX vs. FSGEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Responsible Equity Fund Class A (TSORX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSORX achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than FSGEX's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, TSORX has underperformed FSGEX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while FSGEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.


TSORX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.97%
YTD
7.29%
6M
9.77%
1Y
18.76%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
8.53%

FSGEX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.16%
YTD
15.85%
6M
18.73%
1Y
33.95%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSORX
Nuveen International Responsible Equity Fund Class A
7.29%28.13%2.92%18.90%-15.04%11.57%9.49%23.02%-13.94%21.85%
FSGEX
Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
15.85%32.99%5.34%15.56%-15.75%7.77%10.75%21.41%-13.99%27.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TSORX and FSGEX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between TSORX and FSGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSORX vs. FSGEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSORX
TSORX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TSORX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSORX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSORX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSORX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSORX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGEX
FSGEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSGEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Responsible Equity Fund Class A (TSORX) and Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSORXFSGEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.98

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

11.69

-6.49

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSORX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FSGEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSORX and FSGEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSORXFSGEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

2.31

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.59

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.62

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.42

+0.09

Drawdowns

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSORX drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FSGEX drawdown of -34.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSORX and FSGEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSORXFSGEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.10%

-34.74%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-11.24%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-13.34%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-29.66%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.10%

-34.74%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

0.00%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-8.45%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.86%

+0.57%

Volatility

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen International Responsible Equity Fund Class A (TSORX) is 4.55%, while Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGEX) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that TSORX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSORXFSGEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.95%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

12.28%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

14.56%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.40%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

16.22%

+0.46%

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSORX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSORX vs. FSGEX - Dividend Comparison

TSORX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than FSGEX's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGEX
Fidelity Series Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.61%3.02%2.98%2.90%2.78%2.59%1.68%2.10%2.86%2.48%2.56%2.61%
TSORX
Nuveen International Responsible Equity Fund Class A
5.11%5.48%2.98%2.96%2.03%2.85%1.21%1.34%2.11%0.04%2.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TSORX and FSGEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSGEX has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to TSORX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSORX dropped -33.10% vs FSGEX's -34.74%.

FSGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSORX and FSGEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer