TSMY vs. ARMW
TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSMY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.
Performance
TSMY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMY achieves a 30.47% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 134.95% return.
TSMY
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- 6M
- 21.94%
- YTD
- 30.47%
- 1Y
- 60.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 42.46%
ARMW
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -28.55%
- 6M
- 146.99%
- YTD
- 134.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.87M | $4.86M | $4.12M | |
| $2.14M | $3.13M | $3.04M |
TSMY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 30.47% | 3.90% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 134.95% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMY and ARMW is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMY vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank
TSMY
ARMW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSMY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.72 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMY drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMY and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.15% | -56.50% | +25.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -52.71% | +41.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -27.18% | +21.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | — | — |
Volatility
TSMY vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMY | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.77% | 96.03% | -62.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 96.03% | -61.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 96.03% | -61.39% |
TSMY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
TSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.31%, less than ARMW's 62.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 62.70% | 16.38% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 58.31% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSMY.
ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 62.70%, compared with 58.31% for TSMY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSMY and 0.99% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for TSMY and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer